Home / News / Biden & The Left’s Push To Continue The Evil In Our Schools

Biden & The Left’s Push To Continue The Evil In Our Schools

  • CA Fed­er­al Judge dis­miss­es gen­der tran­si­tion law­suit. “The issue before this Court is not whether it is a good idea for school dis­tricts to noti­fy par­ents of a minor’s gen­der iden­ti­ty and receive con­sent before using alter­na­tive names and pro­nouns, but whether the Unit­ed State Con­sti­tu­tion man­dates such parental author­i­ty. This Court holds that it does not.” Where is your parental author­i­ty accord­ing to the Con­sti­tu­tion of the Unit­ed States? 
  • The Con­sti­tu­tion does not require pub­lic schools to noti­fy par­ents when their chil­dren adopt a gen­der iden­ti­ty at odds with their sex or receive parental con­sent “before using alter­na­tive names and pro­nouns” for their chil­dren, accord­ing to a fed­er­al court in Cal­i­for­nia. US Dis­trict Judge John Mendex said he was observ­ing judi­cial restraint by dis­miss­ing Auro­ra Regino’s law­suit alleg­ing Chico Uni­fied School Dis­trict active­ly hid from Regi­no her fifth-grade daughter’s stat­ed iden­ti­fi­ca­tion as a boy. The dis­trict said it was bound by state law that gives stu­dents the sole choice to dis­close. CA may soon pose a new threat to par­ents who don’t affirm their children’s gen­der iden­ti­ty under a bill approach­ing the gov­er­nor’s desk. Under ratio­nal basis review, a low­er tier of judi­cial scruti­ny, the dis­trict has shown a legit­i­mate state inter­est in cre­at­ing a zone of pro­tec­tion for trans­gen­der stu­dents and those ques­tion­ing their gen­der iden­ti­ty from adverse hos­tile reac­tions such as domes­tic abuse and bul­ly­ing, Mendez wrote. He refused to let Region amend and refile. The rul­ing comes amid nation­wide bat­tles at the state lev­el over in-school tran­si­tions, which often pre­cede the gen­der affirm­ing care of puber­ty block­ers, cross-sex hor­mones and sur­gi­cal removals of gen­i­tals and breasts for gen­der-tran­si­tion youth. More than a thou­sand school dis­tricts have poli­cies that open­ly state school per­son­nel can or should not dis­close to par­ents the gen­der iden­ti­ty of their child when it’s at odds with their sex at birth, accord­ing to a run­ning tal­ly by Par­ents Defend­ing Edu­ca­tion. It com­mis­sioned a poll that found 3 in 4 vot­ers sup­port requir­ing parental consent. 
  • Every sin­gle teacher, coun­selor and school admin­is­tra­tor should face charges by not telling the par­ents. It needs to be against the law to hide these things from par­ents. Now we have lib­er­al judges say­ing that the par­ents are not protected. 
  • School tran­si­tions minor and parental rights are ignored under the guise of “Safe­ty and Confidentiality”
  • It is hap­pen­ing all over the country. 
  • Rep Doug Mal­fa (R‑CA) cit­ed Regino’s law­suit when intro­duc­ing leg­is­la­tion to strip fed­er­al fund­ing from school dis­tricts that take any action, social or med­ical, to tran­si­tion stu­dents with­out parental con­sent. The bill hasn’t moved in the Repub­li­can-con­trolled House com­mit­tee on education. 
  • Amer­i­ca has had it with this. You can­not cre­ate a real­i­ty because Amer­i­ca knows what is hap­pen­ing in their life. Most Amer­i­cans are not polit­i­cal. But when you go into their lives and Amer­i­can fam­i­lies and they have had it with the destruc­tion of the Amer­i­can families. 
  • This goes right in line with evil. 
  • Librar­i­an-In-Chief Joe Biden dreams up ille­gal fed­er­al library code for pub­lic schools. In yet anoth­er gross abuse of exec­u­tive author­i­ty, Biden is wield­ing the pow­er of his Depart­ment of Edu­ca­tion to stop parental efforts to remove sex­u­al­ly explic­it books from pub­lic school libraries. The Biden admin­is­tra­tion’s lat­est assault on parental rights began with an inves­ti­ga­tion of Forsyth Coun­ty Pub­lic Schools over the dis­tric­t’s review of school libraries to flag age-appro­pri­ate sex­u­al mate­ri­als for removal. The school dis­trict express­ly and cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly lim­it­ed the scope of this review to books con­tain­ing obvi­ous­ly sex­u­al­ly explic­it or porno­graph­ic con­tent. No one who reads the rel­e­vant excerpts of these books can seri­ous­ly dis­pute that their graph­ic descrip­tions of nudi­ty, oral sex, sex­u­al assault and oth­er sex­u­al behav­ior meet the district’s rea­son­able stan­dard of con­tent that is inap­pro­pri­ate for school-aged children. 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar
Our mission is to bring you real news, honest analysis, insider & reliable info. Donations help us continue to investigate & report the News, grow, fight, and stay online.

Click Here To Donate

Warm Regards, Voice Of Rural America