In this raw, unfil­tered episode of The Geor­gia Hour (Octo­ber 10, 2025), host BKP unleash­es a blis­ter­ing, tirade against Den­nis Futch, a wealthy Geor­gia Repub­li­can Par­ty donor and self-pro­claimed “author­i­ty” fig­ure, for pub­licly smear­ing offi­cers of the Pick­ens Coun­ty Repub­li­can Par­ty in a leaked email response to their let­ter call­ing for account­abil­i­ty on scan­dals like the First Lib­er­ty Bank Ponzi scheme tied to the Frost fam­i­ly. BKP, who claims deep ties to Pick­ens Coun­ty (includ­ing attend­ing month­ly meet­ings and aid­ing Repub­li­can cam­paigns), declares war: “You crossed the damn line when you went after my friends,” vow­ing no fear of Futch’s mon­ey, influ­ence, or “bought” access to politi­cians like Chair­man Josh McK­oon. He mocks Futch’s failed chair­man bid (only 28 votes despite lav­ish spend­ing on venues and bands), his inabil­i­ty to use BCC in emails (expos­ing 159 state com­mit­tee address­es), and his “con­so­la­tion prize” role lead­ing the Rur­al Vot­er Task Force as a quid pro quo for dona­tions. BKP accus­es Futch of elit­ism, dis­re­spect­ing grass­roots Repub­li­cans, and pri­or­i­tiz­ing “uni­fied” rhetoric over real uni­ty, espe­cial­ly the “30% sin­gle-issue lane” (paper bal­lots, low tax­es, true con­ser­vatism) that the par­ty elite con­stant­ly “shits on.” He urges state com­mit­tee mem­bers to demand an apol­o­gy and dis­tance from “Frost” scan­dals.

Shift­ing to “dad­dy issues” plagu­ing Geor­gia races, BKP dis­sects U.S. Sen­ate con­tender Bud­dy Carter’s ad slam­ming Mike Collins as an “inher­it­ed” truck­ing empire heir (from his late father, ex-law­mak­er Mac Collins), con­trast­ing Carter’s self-fund­ed $4M cam­paign hus­tle with Collins’ “dad­dy’s mon­ey” priv­i­lege. In the gov­er­nor’s race, he spot­lights Attor­ney Gen­er­al Chris Car­r’s point­ed jab at Lt. Gov. Burt Jones dur­ing a speech to the Geor­gia Alliance of Com­mu­ni­ty Hos­pi­tals: “Unlike the lieu­tenant gov­er­nor, I will not… rig the sys­tem to enrich myself or my fam­i­ly.” BKP unpacks the backstory—a 2023 Cer­tifi­cate of Need (CON) law tweak alleged­ly ben­e­fit­ing Jones’ fam­i­ly-owned land in Butts Coun­ty for a med­ical com­plex via his father’s Inter­state Health Sys­tem, amid scruti­ny that forced Jones to piv­ot to a milder 2024 reform. He notes Jones’ Trump endorse­ment but ques­tions his “Amer­i­ca First” cre­den­tials after four years in office with­out address­ing such con­flicts.

 

BKP then expos­es tur­moil in the Geor­gia Free­dom Cau­cus PAC, which he long sup­port­ed, but now crit­i­cizes for GRA ties to the Frosts and First Lib­er­ty fraud. A Sep­tem­ber 17 con­sent order (sur­fac­ing recent­ly) fines the PAC $1,000 in late fees and $4,000 civ­il penal­ty for finance vio­la­tions, plus a $44,050 refund to the Ponzi receiver—prompting its dis­so­lu­tion amid unrav­el­ing donor scruti­ny. He warns this erodes trust ahead of crit­i­cal races (PSC, Sen­ate, gov­er­nor) against Democ­rats.

 

The episode peaks with polit­i­cal tea on Rep. Mar­jorie Tay­lor Greene (MTG), whom BKP sus­pects is maneu­ver­ing for gov­er­nor despite her safe 14th Dis­trict seat. Ana­lyz­ing her media blitz—clips from CNN (push­ing kitchen-table woes like sky­rock­et­ing elec­tric bills, gro­ceries, insur­ance, and wages for her “adult chil­dren” aged 22–28), MSNBC/Morning Joe (lament­ing par­ty dra­ma over pol­i­cy), ABC (health­care cuts), and Atlanta News First (infla­tion’s toll)—he calls her a “Morn­ing Joe dar­ling” and “NBC dar­ling,” not­ing her evo­lu­tion from QAnon pari­ah to “neu­tral” voice on uni­ty, seniors’ insur­ance, and anti-war stances. BKP high­lights her Trump shout-outs and ral­ly pho­tos as untapped ammo, and pre­dicts she’d crush name recog­ni­tion hur­dles for late-entry via­bil­i­ty. He ties it to her past “good old boys” cri­tique of 20 years of GOP rule, urg­ing par­ty merg­er of all lanes for Novem­ber wins.

 

Wrap­ping with a defi­ant close, BKP reaf­firms his grass­roots pas­sion, teas­es a “big sur­prise” for Mon­day, and implores elites to stop alien­at­ing the 30% base: “We need each oth­er… you can’t keep shit­ting on the 30% and then say let’s review the data—why did­n’t we win?” 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This div height required for enabling the sticky sidebar