Wisconsin Supreme Court Race and Curling vs. Raffensperger: Election Stakes

How the Wis­con­sin Supreme Court elec­tion could tip the U.S. House’s bal­ance, with can­di­dates Susan Craw­ford and Trump-backed Brad Schimel—supported by Elon Musk’s $21M—vying for con­trol amid a $75M race fueled by Soros and Illi­nois Gov­er­nor Pritzker’s mil­lions. In Geor­gia, the Curl­ing vs. Raf­fensperg­er case, dis­missed by Judge Amy Toten­berg on March 31, 2024, after over a year on “stand­ing,” mir­rors the Voter­GA case, rais­ing alarm about judi­cial objec­tiv­i­ty and stalled vot­ing sys­tem reforms. Musk’s DOGE ini­tia­tive tar­gets sus­pi­cious­ly wealthy Con­gress mem­bers, while Democ­rats pour funds into Florida’s Dis­trict 1 and 6—not to win, but to shrink mar­gins and craft a 2026 anti-Trump nar­ra­tive. From activist judges to elec­tion integri­ty, this episode unrav­els the high-stakes polit­i­cal chess­board shap­ing America’s future.

• In Wis­con­sin the judge elec­tion could decide the make­up of the House of rep­re­sen­ta­tives. 
• Now in GA, the Curl­ing vs Raf­fensperg­er case has been sit­ting on the judges’ desk for more than a year. It could have changed the vot­er sys­tem in GA. And in GA we don’t want to dri­ve our leg­is­la­tures in a cer­tain direc­tion. The day before they are work­ing to final­ize the vot­ing laws in GA, what they do is dis­miss the case on stand­ing. It was ordered by Judge Amy Toten­berg on March 31, 2024. This reminds us of Bri­an Amero and the Voter­GA case where he hears the case for months and then all of a sud­den it is deter­mined that the case was dis­missed because of stand­ing. YOu don’t lis­ten to a case or have evi­dence pre­sent­ed and take a year to make a deci­sion to dis­miss on stand­ing. 
• This is why the Wis­con­sin Supreme court elec­tion is impor­tant.
• Elon Musk vis­it­ed the CIA to dis­cuss DOGE mea­sures. Elon Musk reveals DOGE new tar­get mem­bers of Con­gress who go strange­ly wealthy. 
• The media is lead­ing you to believe that Elon Musk is try­ing to buy the race but total­ly leave out Soros and Pritzk­er the IL gov­er­nor. The two can­di­dates are Susan Craw­ford has been very clear that she could be very instru­men­tal in chang­ing the lines where repub­li­cans can lose 2 rep­re­sen­ta­tives in Con­gress. Brad Schimel has been endorsed by Don­ald Trump and Elon is putting mon­ey behind Schimel. Elon has put up $21M into the race. We have a prob­lem with activist judges who are politi­cians wear­ing judge’s robes. They are not being objec­tive. We need to have an inde­pen­dent jus­tice sys­tem with­out pol­i­tics. 
• CNN is show­ing $75M over­all spent in the Wis­con­sin Supreme court race. They want to tell you that Elon has $21–21M invest­ed into the race. Did they for­get to tell you that Soros has mil­lions in the race and Pritzk­er, gov­er­nor from IL has mil­lions in the race. 
• Now we have the two dis­tricts in FL. The democ­rats are spend­ing enor­mous amounts of mon­ey in Dis­trict 6 and Dis­trict 1. Now they are not invest­ing to win but to nar­row the gap for the nar­ra­tive for 2026. To get the media to car­ry the water to say Amer­i­cans are angry with Don­ald Trump. They are build­ing the nar­ra­tive. If they can win the case in WI, they have already won in PA, Elise Stafnik was pulled in NY, and if they can nar­row the gap in the two FL races for the nar­ra­tive for 2026 to build the momen­tum.