OPINION: Are Changes Really Coming?

Sub­mit­ted by George McClel­lan

We are enter­ing a new era of dis­cov­ery of the caus­es of Amer­i­c­as decline thanks to Elon Musk get­ting the ball rolling. It’s the New World Order crowd using Cli­mate Con­trol demands as their vehi­cle for change. The Greens demand that we aban­don gas and oil to run our auto­mo­biles and our air­planes, ships, pow­er gen­er­a­tors and lawn mow­ers, to accept the cli­mate sav­ing free resources of renew­al ener­gy, sun and wind. They demand Amer­i­cans wor­ship at the alter of Free Stuff, includ­ing ener­gy. Just on ener­gy alone we know their pri­or­i­ties are impos­si­bly skewed because EVs, no mat­ter how seem­ing­ly prac­ti­cal, are not prac­ti­cal at all. They would­nt work at all if they wer­ent sub­si­dized by the gov­ern­ment. We have already seen in emer­gency sit­u­a­tions like bliz­zards and freez­ing cold, EVs are unable to pro­vide propul­sion and heat for warm­ing at the same time. When the bat­tery dies the vehi­cle sits block­ing the road­way while the dri­ver must trudge through the cold and snow to find a buck­et of elec­tric­i­ty.

Too, the pro­hib­i­tive costs of replace­ment bat­ter­ies will soon find used and unsold EVs fill­ing spaces in vacant lots. The mate­r­i­al costs of min­ing the rare met­als need for these unaf­ford­able bat­ter­ies makes the whole indus­try redun­dant espe­cial­ly as most come from African coun­tries with child labor­ers strug­gle to earn a few pen­nies a day col­lect­ing the rare ores nec­es­sary for bat­tery con­struc­tion. Noth­ings going to change that. Noth­ing!

Our social­ist tend­ing Con­gress just passed the Free­dom of Mar­riage Act. Dont you believe it! While mar­riage has always been a con­tract between a man and a woman sanc­ti­fied by the sacra­ments of many dif­fer­ent reli­gions, Democ­rats see it as the empow­er­ment of per­verts for equi­ty. The act is a trick to nor­mal­ize per­ver­sion in the eyes of the law against whom no com­plaint or issue can be lodged. You will become a hate crim­i­nal if you do. The intend­ed pur­pose is to deliv­er anoth­er crush­ing blow to reli­gion, moral­i­ty and the fam­i­ly unit to fur­ther divide the nation and pro­vide anoth­er legal plat­form for social­iz­ing Amer­i­ca. Just recall what Politi­cians did with the Patri­ot Act to under­stand the per­verse nature of the Free­dom of Mar­riage Act. The Patri­ot Act no longer focus­es on Islam as the source of ter­rorisms but on white Amer­i­cans as the pri­ma­ry source of hate and domes­tic ter­ror­ism. Its why Nan­cy Pelosi focused so hard on round­ing up all the 06 Jan­u­ary pro­test­ers she could get her hands on.

Anoth­er loom­ing issue dan­ger­ous to Amer­i­ca is Bidens promise of dig­i­tal mon­ey, doing away with cash trans­ac­tions. Sounds good does­nt it until you real­ize how close to the Chi­nese mod­el of total sur­veil­lance con­trol the gov­ern­ment will have over Amer­i­can cit­i­zens. You can pur­chase noth­ing, sell any­thing or trade com­modi­ties with­out an armed IRS agent (87,000 of em) stand­ing at your back with his hand out to ensure you pay your fair share. With Dig­i­tal cur­ren­cy, like elec­tric vehi­cles, all the gov­ern­ment will have to do is turn them off at the source, elec­tron­i­cal­ly freeze or seize all of your accounts and let you go into bank­rupt­cy for being unable to pay your bills. They can turn off the pow­er to your car too, on any pre­text. Isnt liv­ing in Amer­i­ca going to be won­der­ful?

Signs of fight­ing back by the GOP are few and far between but, theres a few exam­ples like the Brun­son v Adams case that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear. It has the poten­tial of reveal­ing Con­gress’ con­tempt for the Con­sti­tu­tion by focus­ing on politi­cians who refuse to hon­or their oaths of office. The exer­cise is to point out the prob­a­bil­i­ty that many laws Con­gress has passed has allowed them to ignore their oaths in pur­suit of per­son­al and polit­i­cal gains, which should be void­ed. In effect Brun­son has chal­lenged the doc­trine of equi­table max­im and the doc­trine of the object prin­ci­ple of jus­tice. The seri­ous nature of this case involves the pos­si­ble removal of a sit­ting Pres­i­dent (Biden) and Vice Pres­i­dent (Har­ris) of the Unit­ed States along with mem­bers of the Unit­ed States Con­gress, deem­ing them unfit from ever hold­ing office under Fed­er­al, State, Coun­ty or local Gov­ern­ments.

Remem­ber free­dom is the goal and it is the Con­sti­tu­tion that is the way. Were watch­ing it hap­pen. Now, go get em! (09Dec22)